Data Model for the Comprehensive Management of Biobanks and Its Contribution to Personalized Medicine
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- -
- ICD (International Classification of Diseases) [7]: A classification system used to classify and code diseases, disorders, injuries and causes of death, as well as other health conditions of donors.
- -
- SNOMED-CT (Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine-Clinical Terms) [8,9]: A medical coding system based on a hierarchical system of concepts and semantic relationships used to encode data on types of biological samples, diseases, laboratory procedures, medical treatments and other relevant clinical entities.
- -
- OMOP (Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership) [10,11,12,13]: A data model designed to standardize and analyse clinical data in observational studies, providing a standard framework for data structure and nomenclature. It allows us to store medical data with standardized terminologies. Furthermore, it includes several applications that enable the analysis of patient data for different research purposes.
- -
- BRISQ (Biospecimen Reporting for Improved Study Quality) [14]: A set of recommendations structured into three levels that provide detailed guidelines on how to document and present information about biological samples in biobanks.
- -
- -
2. Design of the Data Model and Their Integration in the Information Management System: Relationship of the Information and Exploitation
- Donor management: donors with sample donations to the Biobank, and potential donors registered in the Andalusian Registry of Donors for Biomedical Research (REDMI) [27].
- Sample/donation management: this includes three main areas: (1) collection of samples and data (donations), (2) sample processing data and (3) stored sample data.
- Request/project management: this module is organized in four areas:
- -
- Legal, ethical and administrative management data related to the requests.
- -
- Follow-up of sample and data acquisition.
- -
- Deliveries of samples and data to the researchers/users.
- -
- Return of research results.
Data Group | Data Description | Type of Data | Recording | BRISQ | MIABIS | OMOP | Catalogue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Donor identification | Sample donor ID | Numeric | Automatic code | √ | √ | ||
Type and Number ID | List, Number | Fields | |||||
First and Last Name | Text | Fields | |||||
Clinical number ID | Number | Fields | |||||
Demographic data | Sex | List | Field | √ | √ | √ | |
Age | Number | Field | √ | √ | √ | ||
Birth date | Date | Field | √ | √ | |||
Race | List | Field | √ | ||||
Ethnicity | List | Field | √ | √ | |||
Country of birth | List | Field | |||||
City and state of birth | List | Field | |||||
City and state of residence (n times) | List | Field | |||||
Contact information | Text | Field | |||||
Landline or Mobile Phone | Number | Fields | |||||
Address | Text | Field | |||||
ZIP | Number | Field | |||||
State | List | Field | |||||
City | List | Field | |||||
Country | List | Field | |||||
Health data (information collected through donor) | Disease status | Text | Field | √ | |||
Clinical or pathology diagnosis | Text | Field | √ | √ | |||
Diagnosis date (chronic diseases) | Text | Field | √ | √ | |||
Clinical characteristics | Text | Field | √ | ||||
Epidemiological characteristics | Text | Field | |||||
Family’s medical history | Text | Field | |||||
Kinship relations | Family ties | List | Field | ||||
Recruitment information | Name of divulgation event | List | Field | ||||
Member of patient associations | List | Field |
Data Group | Data Description | Type of Data | Recording | BRISQ | MIABIS | OMOP | Catalogue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Donation identification | Donation ID | Alphanumeric | Automatic code | √ | √ | ||
Collection (event) date and time | Date/Time | Field | √ | ||||
Source code | Text | Field | |||||
Visit concept | List | Field | √ | √ | |||
Visit concept value | Number or list | Field | √ | √ | |||
Age at event | Auto calculated | Automatic | √ | √ | √ | ||
Care source unit | List | Field | √ | ||||
Clinical data: pathological or control | Diagnosis CIE-10 | List | Questionnaire | √ | √ | √ | |
Health control group | List | Questionnaire | √ | √ | √ | ||
Diagnosis SNOMED-CT | List | Questionnaire | √ | √ | √ | ||
Diagnosis SNOMED II | Text | Questionnaire | √ | √ | √ | ||
Non-codified diagnosis | Text | Questionnaire | √ | √ | √ | ||
Disease status | List | Questionnaire | √ | √ | √ | ||
Debut date | Date | Questionnaire | √ | ||||
Diagnosis date | Date | Questionnaire | √ | √ | √ | ||
Clinical data: treatment and follow-up | Treatment | List | Questionnaire | √ | √ | √ | |
Treatment type | List | Questionnaire | √ | √ | √ | ||
Treatment date | Date | Questionnaire | √ | √ | |||
Treatment response | Text | Questionnaire | √ | √ | |||
Disease-free survivability | Number | Questionnaire | |||||
ECOG scale | List | Questionnaire | |||||
Health perception | General health perception | Text | Questionnaire | √ | |||
Health perception compared to others | Text | Questionnaire | |||||
Health perception compared to last year | Text | Questionnaire | |||||
Health-related limitations | Text | Questionnaire | |||||
Lifestyle and consumption habits | Dietary habits | Text | Questionnaire | √ | |||
Exercise frequency | Text | Questionnaire | √ | ||||
Regularity of alcohol-drinking | Text | Questionnaire | √ | ||||
Tobacco consumption | List | Questionnaire | √ | ||||
Another drugs consumption | List | Questionnaire | √ |
Data Group | Data Description | Type of Data | Recording | MIABIS |
---|---|---|---|---|
Informed consent | Signed consent date | Date | Field | |
Consent file | Archive | Field | ||
Legal representative ID | Number | Field | ||
Legal representative information (name and surname) | Text | Field | ||
Professional ID involved in the information process | Number | Field | ||
Professional identification (name and surname) | Text | Field | ||
Collection method | List | Field | ||
Detail of collection method | Text | Field | ||
Identification of sample (codified or anonymized) | List | Field | ||
Consent to contact later | List | Field | ||
Ways to contact | List | Field | ||
Detail of contact (phone, email…) | Text | Field | ||
Consent to receive genetic or other health relevant information | List | Field | ||
Authorized research areas, education or quality control | List | Field | ||
Use restrictions | Text | Field | √ | |
Revocation | Revocation date | Date | Field | |
Revocation type (partial or total) | List | Field | ||
Revocation file | Archive | Field | ||
Other considerations | Text | Field |
Data Group | Data Description | Type of Data | Recording | BRISQ | MIABIS | OMOP | SPREC | Catalogue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sample identification | Sample ID | Alphanumeric | Automatic code | √ | √ | √ | ||
Source code | Text | Field | ||||||
Applied process data | Process applied ID | Alphanumeric | Automatic code | |||||
Process applied name | List | Field | √ | |||||
Start date and time | Date/time | Field | √ | √ | ||||
End date and time | Date/time | Field | √ | √ | ||||
Pre-analytical data | Type of sample | List | Field | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Sample characteristics | List | Field | √ | |||||
Type of cellular line | List | Field | √ | √ | √ | |||
Anatomical site | List | Field | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||
Quantity of sample (volume or size) | Number | Field | √ | √ | √ | |||
Container | List | Field | √ | √ | √ | |||
Additive | List | Field | √ | √ | √ | |||
Collection date and time | Date/time | Field | √ | |||||
Type of collection/collection mechanism | List | Field | √ | √ | ||||
Reception temperature | Number | Field | √ | |||||
Warm ischemia time | List | Questionnaire | √ | √ | ||||
Cold ischemia time | List | Questionnaire | √ | √ | ||||
Cold ischemia temperature | List | Questionnaire | √ | √ | ||||
Fixation time | Number | Questionnaire | √ | √ | ||||
Reception date and time | Date/Time | Field | √ | |||||
Pre-centrifugation delay | List | Questionnaire | √ | √ | ||||
Pre-centrifugation temperature | List | Questionnaire | √ | √ | ||||
Centrifugation speed | Number | Questionnaire | √ | √ | ||||
Centrifugation time | Number | Questionnaire | √ | √ | ||||
Centrifugation temperature | Number | Questionnaire | √ | √ | ||||
Centrifugation: stroke | List | Questionnaire | √ | √ | ||||
Post-centrifugation delay | List | Number | √ | |||||
Post-centrifugation temperature | List | Questionnaire | √ | |||||
Freezing method | List | Questionnaire | √ | |||||
Freezing temperature | List | Questionnaire | √ | |||||
Long-term storage temperature | List | Questionnaire | √ | √ | √ | |||
Long-term storage container | List | Questionnaire | √ | √ | ||||
Start date and time of storage | Date/Time | Field | √ | |||||
Quality/Analytical data | Thawing method | List | Questionnaire | √ | ||||
Cellular viability (%) and others related | Number | Questionnaire | √ | |||||
Medium of culture | List | Questionnaire | √ | |||||
Method of acid nucleic extraction | List | Questionnaire | √ | |||||
Method of quantification | List | Questionnaire | √ | |||||
Ct value (specific for each PCR: flu, SARS-CoV, VPH…) | Number | Questionnaire | √ | √ | √ | |||
Concentration and others related | Number | Questionnaire | √ | |||||
RIN | Number | Questionnaire | √ | √ | ||||
DIN | Number | Questionnaire | √ | √ | ||||
Immunohistochemical study (Ab and result) | List | Questionnaires | √ | √ | ||||
Histochemical study (staining and result) | List | Questionnaires | √ | |||||
Value of STRs | Number | Questionnaire | ||||||
Chromosome and genetic identification method | List | Questionnaires | √ | √ | ||||
Chromosome formula and others related | Text/number | Questionnaires | √ | √ | ||||
Image of karyotype | Archive | Questionnaire | √ | √ | ||||
Biochemistry parameters (cholesterol, LDL, Protein C, Vitamin D, Glucose…) | Number | Questionnaires | √ | √ | ||||
Screening (positive/negative) microbiological agents (Herpes, SARS-CoV-2, Citomegalovirus, …) | List | Questionnaires | √ | √ | ||||
Haematological parameters (lymphocytes, erythrocytes, …) | Number | Questionnaires | √ | √ | ||||
Histological evaluation | List/Text | Questionnaires | √ | |||||
Histological grade | List | Questionnaire | √ | |||||
Technical report | Archive | Questionnaire | √ |
3. Provision of Samples and Associated Information and Return of Research Results
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- ISO 20387:2018; Biotechnology-Biobanking-General Requirements for Biobanking, First Edition. ISO International Standard: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/67888.html (accessed on 1 August 2018).
- Annaratone, L.; De Palma, G.; Bonizzi, G.; Sapino, A.; Botti, G.; Berrino, E.; Mannelli, C.; Arcella, P.; Di Martino, S.; Steffan, A.; et al. Basic principles of biobanking: From biological samples to precision medicine for patients. Virchows Arch. 2021, 479, 233–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van der Stijl, R.; Manders, P.; Eijdems, E.W.H.M. Recommendations for a Dutch Sustainable Biobanking Environment. Biopreserv. Biobank. 2021, 19, 228–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Denny, J.C.; Collins, F.S. Precision medicine in 2030-seven ways to transform healthcare. Cell 2021, 184, 1415–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borgheresi, R.; Barucci, A.; Colantonio, S.; Aghakhanyan, G.; Assante, M.; Bertelli, E.; Carlini, E.; Carpi, R.; Caudai, C.; Cavallero, D.; et al. NAVIGATOR: An Italian regional imaging biobank to promote precision medicine for oncologic patients. Eur. Radiol. Exp. 2022, 6, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacotot, L.; Woodward, M.; de Montalier, A.; Vaglio, P. Utilizing Modular Biobanking Software in Different Types of Biobanking Activities. Biopreserv. Biobank. 2022, 20, 417–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Health Organization. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (icd). 2023. Available online: https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/classification-of-diseases (accessed on 26 February 2024).
- Shahpori, R.; Doig, C. Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine-Clinical Terms direction and its implications on critical care. J. Crit. Care 2010, 25, e1–e364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Højen, A.R.; Gøeg, K.R. Snomed CT implementation. Mapping guidelines facilitating reuse of data. Methods Inf. Med. 2012, 51, 529–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The Book of OHDSI. 2021. Available online: https://ohdsi.github.io/TheBookOfOhdsi/ (accessed on 26 February 2024).
- Maier, C.; Lang, L.; Storf, H.; Vormstein, P.; Bieber, R.; Bernarding, J.; Herrmann, T.; Haverkamp, C.; Horki, P.; Laufer, J.; et al. Towards Implementation of OMOP in a German University Hospital Consortium. Appl. Clin. Inform. 2018, 9, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lamer, A.; Depas, N.; Doutreligne, M.; Parrot, A.; Verloop, D.; Defebvre, M.M.; Ficheur, G.; Chazard, E.; Beuscart, J.B. Transforming French Electronic Health Records into the Observational Medical Outcome Partnership’s Common Data Model: A Feasibility Study. Appl. Clin. Inform. 2020, 11, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- OHDSI—Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics. Available online: https://www.ohdsi.org/ (accessed on 26 February 2024).
- Moore, H.M.; Kelly, A.B.; Jewell, S.D.; McShane, L.M.; Clark, D.P.; Greenspan, R.; Hayes, D.F.; Hainaut, P.; Kim, P.; Mansfield, E.; et al. Biospecimen reporting for improved study quality (BRISQ). J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 3429–3438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Norlin, L.; Fransson, M.N.; Eriksson, M.; Merino-Martinez, R.; Anderberg, M.; Kurtovic, S.; Litton, J.E. A Minimum Data Set for Sharing Biobank Samples, Information, and Data: MIABIS. Biopreserv. Biobank. 2012, 10, 343–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eklund, N.; Andrianarisoa, N.H.; van Enckevort, E.; Anton, G.; Debucquoy, A.; Müller, H.; Zaharenko, L.; Engels, C.; Ebert, L.; Neumann, M.; et al. Extending the Minimum Information About BIobank Data Sharing Terminology to Describe Samples, Sample Donors, and Events. Biopreserv. Biobank. 2020, 18, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eklund, N.; Engels, C.; Neumann, M.; Strug, A.; van Enckevort, E.; Baber, R.; Bloemers, M.; Debucquoy, A.; van der Lugt, A.; Müller, H.; et al. Update of the Minimum Information About BIobank Data Sharing (MIABIS) Core Terminology to the 3rd Version. Biopreserv. Biobank. 2024; ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Betsou, F.; Lehmann, S.; Ashton, G.; Barnes, M.; Benson, E.E.; Coppola, D.; DeSouza, Y.; Eliason, J.; Glazer, B.; Guadagni, F.; et al. Standard preanalytical coding for biospecimens: Defining the sample PREanalytical code. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2010, 19, 1004–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lehmann, S.; Guadagni, F.; Moore, H.; Ashton, G.; Barnes, M.; Benson, E.; Clements, J.; Koppandi, I.; Coppola, D.; Demiroglu, S.Y.; et al. Standard preanalytical coding for biospecimens: Review and implementation of the Sample PREanalytical Code (SPREC). Biopreserv. Biobank. 2012, 10, 366–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Betsou, F.; Bilbao, R.; Case, J.; Chuaqui, R.; Clements, J.A.; De Souza, Y.; De Wilde, A.; Geiger, J.; Grizzle, W.; Guadagni, F.; et al. Standard PREanalytical Code Version 3.0. Biopreserv. Biobank. 2018, 16, 9–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skoworonska, M.; Blank, A.; Centeno, I.; Hammer, C.; Perren, A.; Zlobec, I.; Rau, T.T. Real-life data from standardized preanalytical coding (SPREC) in tissue biobanking and its dual use for sample characterization and process optimization. J. Pathol. Clin. Res. 2023, 9, 137–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilkinson, M.D.; Dumontier, M.; Aalbersberg, I.J.; Appleton, G.; Axton, M.; Baak, A.; Blomberg, N.; Boiten, J.W.; da Silva Santos, L.B.; Bourne, P.E.; et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 2016, 3, 160018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Snapes, E.; Astrin, J.J.; Krüger, N.B.; Grossman, G.H.; Hendrickson, E.; Miller, N.; Seiler, C. Updating International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories Best Practices, Fifth Edition: A New Process for Relevance in an Evolving Landscape. Biopreserv. Biobank. 2023, 21, 537–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mendy, M.; Caboux, E.; Lawlor, R.T.; Wright, J.; Wild, C.P. Common Minimum Technical Standards and Protocols for Biobanks Dedicated to Cancer Research; IAR Technical Publication nº 44; International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 2017; ISBN 978-92-832-2463-1. [Google Scholar]
- Alonso, J.; Prieto, L.; Antó, J.M. The Spanish version of the SF-36 Health Survey (the SF-36 health questionnaire): An instrument for measuring clinical results. Med. Clin. 1995, 104, 771–776. [Google Scholar]
- T’Joen, V.; Vaneeckhaute, L.; Priem, S.; Van Woensel, S.; Bekaert, S.; Berneel, E.; Van Der Straeten, C. Rationalized Development of a Campus-Wide Cell Line Dataset for Implementation in the Biobank LIMS System at Bioresource Center Ghent. Front. Med. 2019, 6, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aguilar-Quesada, R.; Aroca-Siendones, I.; de la Torre, L.; Panadero-Fajardo, S.; Rejón, J.D.; Sánchez-López, A.M.; Miranda, B. The Andalusian Registry of Donorsfor Biomedical Research: Five Years of History. BioTech 2021, 10, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, A. Virtual global biorepository: Access for all to speed-up result-oriented research. Cell Tissue Bank. 2020, 21, 361–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Souza, Y.G.; Greenspan, J.S. Biobanking past, present and future: Responsibilities and benefits. AIDS 2013, 27, 303–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cambon-Thomsen, A. Assessing the impact of biobanks. Nat. Genet. 2003, 34, 25–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mabile, L.; Dalgleish, R.; Thorisson, G.A.; Deschênes, M.; Hewitt, R.; Carpenter, J.; Bravo, E.; Filocamo, M.; Gourraud, P.A.; Harris, J.R.; et al. Quantifying the use of bioresources for promoting their sharing in scientific research. Gigascience 2013, 2, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bravo, E.; Calzolari, A.; De Castro, P.; Mabile, L.; Napolitani, F.; Rossi, A.M.; Cambon-Thomsen, A. Developing a guideline to standardize the citation of bioresources in journal articles (CoBRA). BMC Med. 2015, 13, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Napolitani, F.; Calzolari, A.; Cambon-Thomsen, A.; Mabile, L.; Rossi, A.M.; De Castro, P.; Bravo, E. Biobankers: Treat the Poison of Invisibility with CoBRA, a Systematic Way of Citing Bioresources in Journal Articles. Biopreserv. Biobank. 2016, 14, 350–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Data Group | Data Description | Type of Data |
---|---|---|
Common data | Summary of project results (divulgation version) | Text |
Summary of project results | Archive | |
Classification of research result (congress, publications or industrial/intellectual property) | List | |
Title of result | Text | |
Publications or technical scientific documents (articles, book, guides, thesis…) | Authors | Text |
Mention of Biobank | List | |
Publication type | List | |
Corresponding author | Text | |
Name of journal | List | |
Indexing (Impact Factor, Quartil, Decil) | Number | |
Publication year | Number | |
Publication date | Date | |
Publication pagination (volume/number/pages) | Number | |
Publication registration ID (PMID/ISSN/DOI/ISBN) | Number | |
Link to publication | Special Text | |
Research result | Archive | |
Communications | Authors | Text |
Congress/conference/symposium name | Text | |
Magazine publication | List | |
Place of celebration (city and country) | Text | |
Date of celebration | Date | |
Organizer entity | List | |
Even type | List | |
Type of participation | List | |
Geographical scope | List | |
Research result | Archive | |
Industrial and intellectual property | Type of industrial property | List |
Owner/s | Text | |
Inventor/s | Text | |
Rights holder entity | Text | |
Application date | Date | |
Application number | Text | |
Country of registration | Text | |
Registration date | Date | |
License concession date | Date | |
Protection mode | List | |
Patent ID | Text | |
PCT Patent | Text | |
Spanish patent | Number | |
Country of property | List | |
Exploitation status | List |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Sánchez-López, A.M.; Catalina, P.; Franco, F.; Panadero-Fajardo, S.; Rejón, J.D.; Romero-Sánchez, M.C.; Puerta-Puerta, J.M.; Aguilar-Quesada, R. Data Model for the Comprehensive Management of Biobanks and Its Contribution to Personalized Medicine. J. Pers. Med. 2024, 14, 668. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14070668
Sánchez-López AM, Catalina P, Franco F, Panadero-Fajardo S, Rejón JD, Romero-Sánchez MC, Puerta-Puerta JM, Aguilar-Quesada R. Data Model for the Comprehensive Management of Biobanks and Its Contribution to Personalized Medicine. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2024; 14(7):668. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14070668
Chicago/Turabian StyleSánchez-López, Ana María, Purificación Catalina, Fernando Franco, Sonia Panadero-Fajardo, Juan David Rejón, María Concepción Romero-Sánchez, Jose Manuel Puerta-Puerta, and Rocío Aguilar-Quesada. 2024. "Data Model for the Comprehensive Management of Biobanks and Its Contribution to Personalized Medicine" Journal of Personalized Medicine 14, no. 7: 668. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14070668
APA StyleSánchez-López, A. M., Catalina, P., Franco, F., Panadero-Fajardo, S., Rejón, J. D., Romero-Sánchez, M. C., Puerta-Puerta, J. M., & Aguilar-Quesada, R. (2024). Data Model for the Comprehensive Management of Biobanks and Its Contribution to Personalized Medicine. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 14(7), 668. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14070668